Editorial Policy
Responsible information with transparency and reliability
info(dot)grland.com
Journalistic Principles
GRland is an independent journalistic organization based in Greece, covering news and thematic topics related to Greece, the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, and the global Greek and international community. Our mission is to serve truth and the public interest by providing content that respects the reader, their intelligence, and their fundamental right to responsible, accurate, and well-documented information. Our journalistic practice aligns with internationally recognized ethical standards, including the SPJ Code of Ethics, the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice, and the applicable EU media standards, and is governed by principles designed to ensure credibility, transparency, and institutional integrity in public information.
Commitment to truth and accuracy
The collection, verification, and presentation of information are conducted through a systematic, methodical, and evidence-based process prior to publication. Each item of information is assessed for the reliability of its source, the clarity of its presentation, and the degree to which it can be independently confirmed. Where an event is ongoing or cannot be fully verified at the time of publication, this is clearly and expressly stated, without ambiguity, in order to prevent misunderstandings or misleading conclusions on the part of the audience.
Honesty, impartiality, and journalistic integrity
News coverage is produced without hidden agendas, manipulation, or selective omission of material facts. GRland does not serve political, financial, or other interests at the expense of factual accuracy. Opinion is not presented as fact. Where commentary, analysis, or interpretation is provided, it is clearly identified as such and distinctly separated from factual reporting, ensuring that readers are always able to understand the nature of the content they are consuming.
Respect for dignity and individual rights
References to individuals are made with due respect for privacy, reputation, and personal data, in accordance with the applicable legal framework of each relevant jurisdiction and with internationally recognized principles for the protection of human dignity. The publication of sensitive content is undertaken only where a clearly demonstrable public interest prevails and is never driven by clickbait practices, exaggeration, or emotional exploitation. The guiding criterion is always the minimization of potential harm.
Transparency in the journalistic process
The origin of information is not treated as a “closed system.” Where the nature of a source is particular or could reasonably influence the reader’s understanding of the content, appropriate contextual information is provided regarding its characteristics, limitations, and relevance. Transparency in the journalistic process enhances audience comprehension and constitutes a core element of trust between the media organization and its readership.
Accountability and continuous improvement
GRland acknowledges that journalism is a human endeavor and that errors may occur. Where inaccuracies are identified, a structured and visible correction process is applied, subsequent amendments are clearly indicated, and readers are provided with the opportunity to contact the editorial team with substantiated observations or corrections. The correction of errors is not a sign of weakness but a demonstration of professionalism and journalistic maturity.
Ongoing development, regulatory compliance, and international adaptation
These journalistic principles are reviewed on a regular basis in order to remain aligned with developments in international media ethics, applicable regulations of the European Union and other jurisdictions covered by GRland, evolving challenges related to misinformation, and the needs of Greek communities worldwide. Every member of the GRland team, whether permanent staff or external contributor, is required to comply with these principles. Any breach may result in the suspension or termination of collaboration and, where appropriate, further action, with the sole objective of safeguarding the credibility of the content and the integrity of the organization.
Fact-Checking
Accuracy constitutes a fundamental pillar of GRland’s journalistic activity. The verification process is applied both prior to publication and after publication, where new information, official clarifications, or additional documentation emerges that may affect the understanding of the reported facts. Our approach aligns with internationally recognized verification standards, including those of the SPJ, IPSO, Reuters, and AP, as well as with the relevant European Union guidelines on combating disinformation.
Multi-layered verification and cross-checking process
Verification at GRland is not limited to a single or superficial assessment of validity. Each piece of information is evaluated with regard to its origin, the credibility of the source, and the possibility of independent confirmation. Where feasible, information is cross-checked against more than one independent source in order to reduce the risk of error or one-sided reporting. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of primary sources, such as official statements, public records, statistical data from competent authorities, and institutional declarations. The use of information originating from a single source occurs only in exceptional circumstances, where the source is institutionally reliable, and this fact is expressly disclosed within the content.
Enrichment and verification through international sources
For matters concerning the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia, GRland draws information from recognized international news agencies and other reliable sources. Any reproduction or reference to content originating from third-party media is subject to an additional verification step, in order to avoid the cascading dissemination of errors or inaccuracies. Speed does not prevail over accuracy.
Handling disputed or uncertain information
Where uncertainties or conflicting information exist, exaggeration, clickbait practices, and the presentation of speculation as fact are deliberately avoided. Readers are informed of the relevant context, the limitations of the available information, and the differing versions under consideration. Upon the emergence of official or verified data, the content is promptly reviewed and updated. Where an error is identified, GRland’s Corrections Policy is activated without undue delay.
Transparency and protection of sources
Sources are identified with clarity and transparency, unless their anonymity is protected by law or is deemed strictly necessary for the safety and integrity of the individual concerned. The use of anonymous sources constitutes an exception rather than the rule and is always accompanied by an enhanced level of internal verification and documentation.
Sources & Misinformation
The credibility of GRland is founded on the responsible acquisition, assessment, and use of information from sources that serve the public interest rather than misinformation or manipulation. Our journalistic practice aligns with the quality standards for public information applicable in the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia, while taking into account the specific legal and social characteristics of each jurisdiction. Source management is not treated as a formal or mechanical process, but as a critical safeguard for truth, social cohesion, and public trust.
Framework for the evaluation and prioritization of sources
Prior to publication, sources are systematically assessed with regard to their origin, demonstrated reliability, and the possibility of independently verifying the information provided. Any potential interests, motivations, or dependencies that could affect the accuracy or impartiality of the information are also examined.
Limited and controlled use of social media content
Content originating from social media platforms such as Facebook, X/Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and comparable services is used solely as supplementary material and never as the sole basis of a publication. Videos, images, or posts that appear detached from their original context, originate from anonymous or questionable accounts, or display indications of manipulation are rejected without further use. Popularity or rapid dissemination does not constitute evidence of accuracy or reliability.
Deepfakes, manipulated media, and AI-generated content
GRland applies a dedicated verification process to multimedia material that may have been produced or altered through artificial intelligence technologies or other forms of manipulation. This process includes checks of image and audio authenticity, metadata analysis, cross-verification with independent sources, and the use of technical tools where there is a reasonable indication of alteration. Content intended to mislead the public or that may reasonably be perceived as fabricated is not published. Where AI-generated or AI-assisted material is used and there is a risk of misinterpretation, this is expressly disclosed in order to protect the reader’s understanding.
Addressing misinformation and reports from the public
Where a reader, organization, or institution identifies a potential inaccuracy or misleading element, an internal review mechanism is activated without delay. Additional evidence, official clarifications, or new documentation are sought, and where an error is confirmed, GRland’s Corrections Policy is applied promptly. This process does not constitute an admission of weakness, but an act of accountability and professional responsibility, ensuring that public information is continuously improved and remains reliable.
Protection of sources and secure handling of information
Where disclosure of a source’s identity could place their safety, professional standing, or lawful rights at risk, GRland takes all necessary protective measures. Anonymity is preserved, exposure of personal data is limited to what is strictly necessary, and sensitive material is handled with enhanced security safeguards. The use of anonymous sources constitutes an exception and is permitted only where it serves a clear and well-documented public interest, and is always accompanied by additional layers of verification and internal oversight.
Corrections Policy
Information is continuously evolving, and timely adaptation constitutes a substantive responsibility toward the public. GRland applies a formalized and transparent correction process aimed at maintaining accuracy and strengthening the relationship of trust with its readers. Corrections are treated as an act of professional credibility and journalistic maturity — not as an admission of liability or wrongdoing.
Purpose and philosophy of the Corrections Policy
GRland’s Corrections Policy is designed to ensure that published content remains accurate, clear, and up to date, even after publication. This process functions as a quality assurance mechanism rather than as a tool for withdrawing or concealing information from the public domain. Errors are not “erased.” They are corrected, documented, and made visible.
Types of corrections and revisions
GRland implements corrections of factual errors where inaccuracies are identified in data, figures, names, or attributed statements. In parallel, articles may be updated or revised when new, substantiated information or official clarifications emerge that affect the completeness or understanding of the content. Where wording may give rise to misinterpretation, clear clarification is applied, and where full transparency is required for material changes, editorial notes are added to clearly inform the reader. Any material modification is indicated within the article or at its end and is accompanied by the date and time of the most recent update.
Internal review and decision-making process
Upon receipt of a correction request, an internal review process is initiated by the editorial team. The original source, the journalistic context, and the supporting documentation are re-examined. Where necessary, the opinion of independent experts or institutional bodies may be sought. The final decision is taken with due regard to the public interest, accuracy, and completeness of the information. This process does not constitute an admission of fault, but forms part of the organization’s professional quality control framework.
Response timeline and reasonable limits
GRland makes every reasonable effort to respond to correction requests within fourteen (14) business days. In cases where international communication with institutions, additional investigation, or the collection of supporting evidence from third parties is required, the process may be extended. Priority remains on objectivity and accuracy, even where this requires additional time, in order to avoid hasty or incomplete corrections.
Sources of requests and acceptance criteria
Correction requests may be submitted by readers, affected individuals, public authorities, organizations, or collaborating partners. Each request is assessed based on its clarity, seriousness, and the verifiability of the information provided. Anonymous, vague, malicious, or insufficiently substantiated requests may be rejected with justification, particularly where they do not provide an adequate basis for review.
Traceability, transparency, and change history
For the purposes of full transparency, substantive corrections and revisions are accompanied by a timestamp and recorded in an internal editorial change log. Where a headline or the core conclusions of an article are modified, a clear notice indicating that “The article has been updated” is displayed, so that readers are aware that a material revision has taken place. This practice enhances accountability and safeguards the credibility of both the content and the organization.
Independence & Integrity
The journalistic judgment of GRland is the exclusive responsibility of the editorial team and is not subject to any external or non-editorial influence. We are committed to ensuring that public information is determined by verified facts and journalistic substantiation — not by financial, political, or other interests. Integrity is not a declaration; it is a non-negotiable operational principle.
Distinct roles and institutional safeguards
The publisher and the organization’s management do not intervene in editorial topics, content, or the manner in which news is presented. They neither approve nor reject articles on the basis of financial, political, or advertising considerations, nor do they exert influence over editorial evaluation or the prioritization of issues. The editorial team retains full autonomy in topic selection, journalistic investigation, documentation methodology, and the presentation of conclusions. This institutional separation constitutes a core mechanism for safeguarding editorial independence and credibility.
Zero tolerance for interference and pressure
Any attempt to influence journalistic judgment by advertisers, political actors or governmental bodies, businesses, organizations, or private interests is rejected immediately and unequivocally. Requests to conceal, modify, or delay publication are not considered, except where they concern a verified journalistic error, which is addressed exclusively through GRland’s Corrections Policy, or a substantiated public-interest risk, which is assessed solely by the editorial team using strict journalistic criteria. GRland reserves the right to terminate collaborations and to pursue legal remedies where journalistic freedom or editorial independence is threatened.
Full transparency in funding and partnerships
Revenue derived from advertising, partnerships, or sponsorships is not linked to editorial coverage, topic visibility, or the evaluation of news content. The organization’s commercial activities operate independently from its journalistic function. All advertising or commercial material is clearly labeled and cannot, under any circumstances, be construed as journalistic content, in accordance with GRland’s Advertising & Content Separation Policy.
Serving the public and reader interest
Editorial decisions are taken with the objective presentation of reality in mind, the reliable informing of Greeks in the diaspora and philhellenes worldwide, and the promotion of a healthy, well-documented public discourse. Commercial performance, audience reach, or traffic metrics do not constitute criteria that influence journalistic judgment or editorial agenda.
Internal mechanisms for safeguarding independence
In the event of a complaint, suspicion, or indication of a breach of editorial independence, an immediate internal review is conducted. The relevant information is assessed by the editorial lead, and corrective or disciplinary measures are taken where required, with the objective of restoring institutional order and trust. Adherence to editorial independence is a fundamental condition for participation in GRland’s editorial team and an integral element of the organization’s professional ethics.
The final responsibility for editorial direction, topic selection, prioritization, and presentation of content rests with the Editorial Management of GRLAND, which operates independently of commercial, advertising, or other external influences.
Transparency & Conflicts of Interest
Readers’ trust is not taken for granted; it is earned and maintained on a daily basis through acts of transparency and accountability. GRland applies a clear and binding conflict-of-interest management policy to ensure that no personal, professional, or financial relationship compromises public information. Journalism serves society and the public interest — not private gain or transactional arrangements.
Prevention of conflicts of interest
Members of GRland’s editorial team and collaborators refrain from covering topics related to family relationships, financial dealings, professional partnerships, or close personal associations where such relationships could reasonably cast doubt on impartiality and independence of judgment. The final decision regarding participation in such coverage rests with the editorial lead and is based exclusively on safeguarding objectivity, transparency, and the credibility of the content.
Gifts, benefits, and inducements
GRland does not accept money, gifts of significant monetary value, benefits that create an expectation of reciprocity, or travel, hospitality, or other accommodations that are directly or indirectly linked to favorable journalistic coverage. By way of limited exception, items of no material economic value may be accepted only where it is clear that they do not influence journalistic judgment and do not create any sense of obligation or dependency. In any case of doubt, the benefit is declined. The editorial management retains final and binding discretion.
Transparency in financial and personal relationships
Where an editor or contributor has a financial, business, or familial relationship with a subject, organization, or matter under coverage, they are required to inform the editorial team prior to any involvement in the relevant content. Where deemed necessary in the interest of transparency and the protection of public trust, an explicit disclosure notice or disclaimer is included within the article. This practice does not constitute personal exposure, but an act of honest and responsible journalism.
Zero tolerance for interference and “hidden arrangements”
Any attempt to exert pressure, offer inducements, engage in coercion, or provide benefits with the intent to alter, suppress, or unduly influence content is reported immediately to editorial management and addressed without delay. GRland reserves the full right to terminate collaborations and to pursue legal action in any case where the independence, integrity, or credibility of public information is threatened.
Credibility is not negotiable. We do not compromise on it. Period.
Advertising & Content
Readers have an inalienable right to know when they are consuming editorial information and when they are being exposed to a commercial message. GRland applies a strict policy separating advertising from editorial content, with full transparency toward its audience. Commercial activity does not influence topic selection, evaluation, prioritization of news, tone, or the conclusions of journalistic coverage. Editorial decisions are taken independently and without interference.
Clear and visible labeling of commercial content
Any publication involving a commercial or financial relationship is clearly identified before the reader engages with the content. The disclosure remains visible throughout the entire reading experience. Depending on the nature of the collaboration, indicative labels may include:
- “Sponsored Content”, where a commercial collaboration exists without interference in editorial judgment,
- “Advertorial”, where promotional material is presented in a journalistic-style format,
- “Paid Partnership”, in cases of direct commercial campaigns,
- “Affiliate Links”, where the content includes links that may generate a commission.
Protection of readers from misleading practices
GRland does not permit the presentation of advertising material as journalistic news, the concealment of sponsors or corporate relationships, the use of clickbait leading to promotional material, or the publication of paid content without clear disclosure. Misleading the reader is not an acceptable practice, regardless of any financial benefit. This policy aligns with the international and European transparency and consumer protection framework, including the EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the ASA CAP Code (United Kingdom), and the FTC Endorsement and Disclosure Rules (United States). GRland maintains internal records for each commercial collaboration to ensure accountability and legal compliance.
Independence from advertisers and partners
Advertisers and commercial partners have no right to determine, approve, or modify editorial content, to request changes in coverage, or to influence the prominence or ranking of news items. Public trust is not a tradable asset.
Institutional boundary between Editorial and Business
The organization maintains a strict and operational separation between editorial functions and commercial or advertising management. Individuals responsible for negotiating advertising agreements or sponsorships do not participate in editorial decision-making and do not influence the evaluation or presentation of news content. This separation constitutes a fundamental condition of credibility and a cornerstone of GRland’s journalistic independence.
AI Policy & Oversight
GRland uses Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies exclusively as supportive tools within the journalistic process and never as a substitute for human judgment, responsibility, or editorial decision-making. Final responsibility for every publication remains strictly human and is not transferred to automated systems or algorithms.
- AI supports our work.
- Journalism requires judgment, responsibility, and accountability.
Purpose and limits of AI use
The use of AI tools at GRland is strictly limited to supportive functions, such as accelerating research and data retrieval, analyzing and organizing information, linguistic editing and translation, and enhancing the reader experience. Artificial intelligence does not determine editorial topics, editorial stance, media direction, or the conclusions of journalistic coverage. It does not make decisions and does not autonomously produce journalistic content with binding or authoritative character.
Forms of application and limitations
GRland may use AI tools to support drafting processes, automated translation and proofreading, the identification of potential misinformation, and the technical analysis of multimedia content, where deemed necessary. No AI system carries a journalistic byline, nor is it recognized as an author or as a responsible party for published content.
Human oversight and final editorial review
Any text, image, dataset, or multimedia material that has been produced or supported through AI tools is subject to human review by a member of the editorial team. Content is reviewed, edited, and approved prior to publication in order to prevent inaccuracies, avoid misleading context, and ensure compliance with journalistic ethics and applicable legal frameworks. Where problematic or erroneous output related to the use of AI is identified, GRland’s Corrections Policy is activated without delay and, where appropriate, it is clarified that the content was modified following human re-evaluation.
Addressing synthetic and manipulated information
GRland applies enhanced safeguards against deepfakes, synthetic media, manipulated images or audio recordings, misattributed events, and artificial “hallucinations” produced by AI systems. Where AI is used in multimedia material or in cases where there is a risk of misinterpretation, this is expressly disclosed, so that readers have full awareness of the relevant context.
Transparency, technical limitations, and responsibility
It is acknowledged that AI systems may exhibit incomplete contextual understanding, incorrect associations, latent biases, or the generation of content that does not meet ethical standards. GRland does not guarantee the absolute accuracy of content assisted by AI due to the inherent technical limitations of such systems and commits to intervening promptly when issues are identified.
Legal and institutional compliance
GRland’s use of AI technologies complies with Greek law, the European regulatory framework on artificial intelligence and data protection, and relevant international guidelines, codes of conduct, and best practices in contemporary journalism. The protection of personal data, transparency, and the avoidance of creating or disseminating misleading content constitute non-negotiable principles.
Diversity & Equality
Public information constitutes a public good, not a privilege. GRland is committed to producing and hosting content that respects human dignity and ensures fair, equal, and responsible representation in public discourse, regardless of origin, nationality, gender, identity, beliefs, age, or social status. GRland aligns with applicable anti-discrimination legal frameworks, internationally recognized journalistic ethics, and established principles for the protection of human rights. Diversity is not a communication tool; it reflects the realities of the societies we inform.
Zero tolerance for discrimination and hate speech
GRland does not publish content that incites or legitimizes racism, xenophobia, ethnic or social discrimination, targeting based on religious, political, or ideological beliefs, nor the denigration or stigmatization of individuals on the basis of disability, age, or vulnerability. Content that may cause social exclusion or reinforce harmful stereotypes is rejected. Where a topic may affect vulnerable groups, enhanced editorial scrutiny is applied prior to publication, with the aim of preventing harm and safeguarding social cohesion.
Responsible representation without stereotypes
When referring to individuals or communities, generalizations, oversimplifications, stereotypical narratives, and sensationalism are avoided. The journalistic approach prioritizes accuracy, dignity, and cultural understanding, even when topics are socially sensitive or contentious. GRland does not commodify human diversity nor exploit tragedies, identities, or social tensions for the purpose of increasing audience reach.
Multilingual and multicultural approach
GRland addresses an international audience within the Greek diaspora and philhellenic communities worldwide. Our journalistic coverage takes into account diverse cultural, social, and legal contexts, avoiding ethnocentric perspectives and one-dimensional narratives. Plurality of voices, equal representation, and the inclusion of diverse experiences constitute essential elements of a modern, international news organization. Greece is not one-dimensional; it is part of a global whole.
Protection of vulnerable individuals and groups
In cases involving minors, victims of violence or crime, individuals with health conditions or disabilities, stricter publication standards are applied. The disclosure of personal data is limited to what is strictly necessary, descriptions that may cause re-traumatization are avoided, and priority is given to the safety and dignity of those concerned. Journalistic coverage must not exacerbate the situation of individuals who are already in a vulnerable position.
Continuous training and review of practices
GRland’s diversity and inclusion policy is not static. It is reviewed and updated on a regular basis, in line with international developments in the field of human rights, European and international guidelines on representation, and best practices in contemporary multicultural journalism. All members of GRland’s editorial team and collaborators are committed to adhering to these principles as an integral part of their professional responsibility.
Journalist Safety & Wellbeing
Free, independent, and well-documented journalism requires editors and contributors to work without fear, pressure, or threats. GRland is committed to protecting the safety, dignity, and mental well-being of all individuals involved in the production of its content. The protection of journalists is not a matter of internal convenience.
It is a prerequisite for democracy and freedom of the press.
Digital and physical security
GRland implements organizational, technical, and institutional measures to prevent cyberattacks, targeting, harassment, intimidation, malicious actions, and the unlawful use or disclosure of personal data. Particular attention is given to cases of investigative journalism or coverage of topics that may provoke reactions or threats. Where a threat is identified or reported, immediate support is provided to the journalist, internal protection mechanisms are activated, and, where necessary, legal counsel is engaged or cooperation with competent authorities is sought. The protection of the physical and digital integrity of journalists takes precedence over any other operational priority.
Protection of personal identity and privacy
Personal information relating to editors and collaborators is not disclosed without explicit and informed consent and is not shared with third parties unless there is a lawful and substantiated obligation to do so. The handling of such data complies with the GDPR, Greek law, and the applicable European and international data protection framework. In cases where there is a risk of targeting, harassment, or threats, a corporate byline, initials, or anonymity may be used, subject to editorial judgment. This option constitutes a protective measure and not a restriction of journalistic identity.
Prevention of pressure, intimidation, and interference
Any form of pressure or interference aimed at distorting editorial judgment, concealing information of public interest, forcing the disclosure of sources, or undermining the professional standing and safety of editors and contributors is strictly prohibited. GRland is committed to defending members of its editorial team against such practices, including by taking legal action, terminating collaborations, and referring matters to the competent authorities, where journalistic independence or personal safety is threatened.
Workplace well-being and a supportive environment
The organization fosters a working environment based on mutual respect, psychological safety, equality, and inclusivity. Freedom of expression within the editorial team is not constrained by fear or arbitrary hierarchy, but is supported through collaboration, protection from harassment, and encouragement of professional development. The well-being of those who produce public information constitutes an integral element of content quality and credibility.
Institutional and international compliance
GRland’s policy on the safety and well-being of journalists complies with Greek labor and criminal law, European legislation on freedom of the press and data protection, and international recommendations and standards for the protection of journalists, including those articulated by the United Nations, the Council of Europe, the OSCE, and international organizations defending press freedom. The safety of journalists is not a negotiable parameter. It is an institutional responsibility of the organization.
Copyright & Multimedia
Ownership of GRland content
Original content produced by GRland’s editorial team, collaborating journalists, photographers, and creators constitutes the intellectual property of the organization or is lawfully licensed to it under valid terms of use. Such material is protected by Greek copyright law, European Union law, and applicable international conventions governing the protection of literary, visual, and multimedia works. Reproduction, republication, modification, or commercial exploitation of this content without prior authorization is prohibited, unless expressly permitted by law.
Use of multimedia from third-party sources
GRland uses third-party material only where clear and well-documented conditions are met. Specifically, use is permitted where a valid license exists, where the material is made available under legally secure open-content licenses, where it falls within lawful journalistic exceptions for quotation or excerpting, or where written permission has been granted by the creator or rights holder. All third-party sources are expressly credited in accordance with the applicable license terms. Material of unclear, disputed, or unverifiable origin is not used.
Stock content & commercial rights
Where stock images, videos, or graphics are used, GRland retains documentation of the license, origin, and relevant identification details of the material. No processing is carried out that alters the content in a manner that creates a new protected derivative work or violates the terms of the license. In cases of visual similarity or alleged “similar works,” assessment is based exclusively on objective legal criteria of originality, rather than subjective or aesthetic comparisons.
Zero tolerance for rights infringement
GRland does not tolerate the use of material without authorization, the copying of content from third-party media, or republication without clear source attribution. Where a potential infringement of third-party rights is identified, the relevant material is removed without delay and a review and compliance process is initiated. The adoption of corrective measures does not constitute an admission of liability, but rather the application of a transparency policy and respect for creators’ rights.
AI-generated multimedia and content
For images, videos, or graphics that have been produced or supported through artificial intelligence tools, mandatory human oversight is applied. Where required, the use of AI is expressly disclosed, and it is ensured that the content does not infringe third-party rights or reproduce protected works or identifiable elements without authorization. GRland does not use AI-generated content that creates confusion as to the origin or ownership of the material.
Citation of sources and public documents
The use of official public documents, statistical data, and excerpts is permitted for the purposes of information, substantiation, and analysis, provided that the extent of use is reasonable and the source is clearly identified. Quotation does not distort the meaning of the original material nor infringe the rights of creators.
Handling of infringement reports
Creators or rights holders who believe that their rights have been affected may contact GRland’s editorial team directly. Each request is reviewed without delay and, where an infringement is confirmed, corrective measures or removal of the material are implemented promptly. This process constitutes an expression of institutional responsibility and respect for intellectual property.
GDPR / UK GDPR / CCPA / PIPEDA
The protection of personal data constitutes a fundamental operating principle of GRland and an integral part of the trust built with its audience. As an independent journalistic organization based in Greece with an international readership across the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia, we are committed to processing personal data lawfully, transparently, proportionately, and with full respect for the rights of data subjects. Privacy is not a technical issue. It is a fundamental right.
Lawful, proportionate, and purpose-limited processing
GRland collects and processes personal data only where a clear and lawful legal basis exists, such as user consent, legitimate interest, contractual necessity, or legal obligation. Processing is strictly limited to the purpose for which the data are collected and does not exceed what is strictly necessary for the operation of services and journalistic activity. Users are informed in a clear, comprehensible, and accessible manner about the nature and purpose of processing. No data are requested or retained beyond what is required.
International regulatory compliance
GRland complies with the applicable data protection regulatory frameworks, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the UK GDPR for content and services directed to users in the United Kingdom, the CCPA/CPRA for visitors located in California, and PIPEDA for Canada. Where different legal frameworks provide different levels of protection, the stricter and more user-favorable standard is applied.
Transparency and data subject rights
Readers and users of GRland fully retain their rights in relation to their personal data, including the right of access, rectification, restriction or erasure of processing, withdrawal of consent, and the right to lodge a complaint with a competent supervisory authority. The procedures for exercising these rights are described in detail in the organization’s official Privacy Policy and are implemented without discrimination or undue delay.
Security, confidentiality, and third-party providers
GRland implements appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect data against unauthorized access, loss, alteration, or misuse. Data sharing with third parties is strictly limited to cases where it is necessary for service operation, legally required, or expressly authorized by the user. Each partner or service provider is contractually bound by confidentiality obligations and compliance with applicable data protection law.
Special categories of data and journalistic exemptions
GRland does not collect or process special categories of personal data—such as health data, political opinions, religious beliefs, or sexual orientation—unless this is strictly required for reasons of public interest, provided for by law, or carried out with explicit consent. Journalistic exemptions are applied only where justified by the nature of the subject matter and always with due regard to the protection of privacy and human dignity.
Cookies and tracking technologies
Cookies and similar technologies are used for clearly defined purposes of functionality, statistical analysis, and, where permitted, commercial communication. Where required by law, their use is based on the user’s prior consent, which may be withdrawn or modified at any time. Relevant information is described in detail in GRland’s Cookies Policy.
Journalistic processing and protection of privacy
Within the scope of journalistic activity, only personal data strictly necessary for understanding the facts are published. The privacy of individuals mentioned in publications is protected, particularly where private persons, minors, or vulnerable individuals are involved. The journalistic mission does not constitute a license for indiscriminate disclosure of personal data.
Continuous review and improvement
GRland’s personal data protection policy is reviewed on a regular basis to remain aligned with legislative developments, international best practices, and the real needs of the public. Internal compliance audits ensure the effective implementation of these principles.
Relationship with the Privacy Policy
This section outlines the core principles of personal data protection at GRland. Complete and detailed information regarding the legal bases for processing, data retention periods, contact details, and competent supervisory authorities is provided in the official Privacy Policy of GRland.
Contact the Editorial Team
Active reader participation constitutes a cornerstone of GRland’s journalistic function. The organization encourages its audience to communicate with the editorial team regarding matters of accuracy, ethics, quality, and content safety, thereby contributing meaningfully to the continuous improvement of public information. Communication with the editorial team enhances accountability. It does not replace editorial independence.
Official Communication Channels
Reports, observations, requests, and proposals are submitted exclusively through GRland’s official contact form:
Contact: LINK
Use of this procedure ensures proper recording, traceability, and professional handling of each request. Requests submitted through unofficial channels may not be taken into consideration.
Types of requests reviewed
Through the contact form, readers may submit requests concerning corrections or clarifications of article content, indications of potential misinformation, matters of journalistic ethics, safety, or intellectual property, as well as proposals aimed at improving the quality and reliability of the content. Each request is assessed on the basis of evidence, journalistic principles, and the public interest.
Acceptance and rejection criteria
GRland reserves the right not to review anonymous, malicious, coercive, or vague requests, particularly where they are not accompanied by verifiable information. The rejection of such requests does not constitute a lack of transparency, but rather the protection of the journalistic process from abusive interference.
Review timeframe
The editorial team makes reasonable efforts to respond to requests within fourteen (14) business days. In cases requiring additional investigation, verification, or the involvement of third parties (e.g., institutional or legal bodies), the review period may be extended. This timeframe reflects professional practice and does not constitute a legal obligation.
Transparency of outcomes and public notice
Where a request results in a material change or correction to content, GRland’s Corrections Policy is applied and public notice is provided within the article or at its end, with a clear indication and timestamp. In matters involving sensitive information, the final decision takes into account both the public interest and the protection of the individuals referenced in the content.
Protection of readers’ personal data
Information submitted via the contact form is used exclusively for the handling of the specific request. It is not shared with third parties without a lawful basis and is processed in accordance with the GDPR and the applicable European and international data protection framework. No disclosure of personal data takes place without prior and explicit consent.
Limits of intervention and editorial independence
GRland listens, respects, and responds. It does not, however, accept requests aimed at exerting pressure, coercively altering content, or undermining editorial independence. Final responsibility and judgment regarding journalistic content remain exclusively with the editorial team.
Last updated: 27.12.2025
GRland’s content aims to inform rather than manipulate, to foster convergence rather than polarization, and to promote understanding of reality rather than the exploitation of fear. Its journalistic approach is grounded in documentation, composure, and a clear distinction between facts and commentary. Excessive dramatization, emotional manipulation, and the deliberate cultivation of anxiety for the purpose of increasing traffic are systematically avoided. Public information is meant to serve dialogue, not to poison it.
Rejection of toxic and harmful content
GRland does not publish content that incites or legitimizes violence, hatred, racist targeting, or social exclusion. Material based on stereotypes, sensationalism, or the portrayal of human suffering as spectacle is rejected. Practices such as clickbait, coercive dramatization, and fear-based engagement are excluded as incompatible with journalistic ethics. Social tension is not a journalistic product.
Contribution to healthy public discourse
GRland seeks to highlight topics that strengthen democratic dialogue, human rights, social justice, culture, education, science, and knowledge. Diverse viewpoints are presented with respect and substantiation, not as a battlefield for confrontation or polarization. Pluralism of opinion presupposes responsibility and does not equate unsubstantiated claims with established facts.
Accessibility and multilingual approach
As a media outlet addressing the Greek diaspora and an international audience, GRland takes into account diverse social, cultural, and legal contexts. Where feasible, a multilingual approach and content adaptation are pursued, with respect for local sensitivities and specificities. Our journalism has no borders, but it has a shared journalistic identity.
Environmental and ethical awareness
GRland avoids content that normalizes the exploitation of people or animals, undermines humanitarian values, or disregards environmental impact. Journalism must operate with awareness of the social and environmental consequences of public information. Responsibility of expression extends beyond the present moment.
Institutional and legal compliance
GRland’s policy on social responsibility and ethical content is grounded in Greek law, European guidelines on media ethics, including the EU Digital Services Act, and international principles for the protection of human rights, as articulated by the United Nations, UNESCO, and the OSCE. This policy is reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that it remains current, functional, and substantively effective.